Infant feeding and planetary health go hand in hand

I recently woke up to a headline with the words “climate” and “hope” strung together. As author Jeff Brady points out, it’s “…something you don’t hear much when it comes to climate change: hope.” 

Brady goes on to illuminate a recent International Energy Agency (IEA) report that shows “countries are setting records in deploying climate-friendly technologies…” 

There’s more: “While greenhouse gas emissions keep rising, the IEA finds that there’s still a path to reaching net-zero emissions by 2050 and limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, or 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit. That’s what’s needed to avoid the worst effects of climate change, such as catastrophic flooding and deadly heatwaves,” he writes.

Photo by Mika Baumeister on Unsplash

It’s hard to imagine that we’re in a place where there’s still the potential for “the worst effects.” Are we not already there? 

Not long ago, when extreme weather occurred, we were told it wasn’t possible to link specific events to the climate crisis. Now though, scientists have figured out a model to represent how the climate crisis produces specific weather events like hurricanes and extreme heat.

Extreme weather events and other disasters and emergencies will continue to occur, so it’s imperative that we develop infant and young child feeding in emergencies (IYCF-E) preparedness in the U.S., something we are seriously bad at.  

Jennifer Russell’s, MSN, RN, IBCLC, NHDP-BC, Ph.D. Candidate in Nursing Science from the University of Tennessee Health Science Center co-authored Domestic Preparedness Journal article “Challenges with pediatric mass care feeding,”(p 27-31) details the importance of and how state, local, tribal, and territorial organizations’ (SLTTs) can “safely, effectively, equitably, and quickly provide pediatric feeding support” in emergencies. 

Namely, the authors state: “SLTTs must estimate and plan for the logistical distribution and cost of breastfeeding and re-lactation supplies along with safe alternatives to mothers’ breastmilk and other pediatric feeding items.” The authors bust some common misconceptions about emergency response and offer ways in which we can improve existing guidance. 

Photo by Dave Clubb on Unsplash

In her most recent guest post on Our Milky Way, “Nourishing Children and the Planet”,  Healthy Children Project’s Donna Walls considers the critical weather events of late and highlights the urgency of education, legislation and action.

Walls points out that lactation care providers (LCPs) and health advocates can and should take a leading role in the fight for the health of our planet.  LCPs are important actors within the greater need for national-level policy development, and LCPs’ work helps to mitigate the more grandiose challenges of the climate crisis.  

——–

The first best food for infants is mother’s own milk. We all know about the benefits for mothers and babies, but we don’t often discuss the benefits for the health of the planet.

https://www.gifa.org/en/international-2/green-feeding/

This is a win-win situation. By providing our infants and children with cleaner, “greener” foods, we also create a cleaner, safer environment for our families, our communities and the world. 

By contrast, commercial milk formulas (CMFs) are harmful to the planet because they require procurement of ingredients and manufacturing and transport of the product. All of these processes use resources and contribute to the increasing burden of greenhouse emissions. Read Powdered Baby Formula Sold in North America: Assessing the Environmental Impact for a detailed look at the environmental and Greenhouse Gas impact of powdered baby formula, which as the authors note, “should be considered when developing and funding infant and young child feeding policies and supportive programs.”

Water resources are scarce in many countries around the world, and yet “about 5000 litres of water are used for every kilogram of milk powder, including producing the milk, then processing the powdered milk, preparing the feeds, and sterilising feeding equipment.” (Linnecar, van Esterik, 2023).  Unnecessary use of precious water resources threatens the very survival of children across the globe.

It’s true that “the few extra litres of water required by a breastfeeding mother are negligible compared to the amounts of water for formula production and preparation.” (Linnecar, van Esterik, 2023

Destruction of natural resources, such as the rainforest for harvesting ingredients as well as ever-mounting pollution from plastics is creating a negative impact on the environment ultimately contributing to rapid climate change. 

By supporting breastfeeding families,  LCPs can be the first line of defense by reducing pollution and minimizing the powerful effects of the climate crisis. Breastfeeding  is, without doubt, the cleanest, “greenest” form of infant nutrition. 

Ultra processed foods (UPFs) impact on  health

What’s more, we have evidence that breastfed infants consume less ultra processed foods (UPFs) as they get older (Paharia, 2023). 

UPFs not only strain our resources but have been shown to increase rates of type 2 diabetes, obesity, hypertension, cardiovascular disease and dementia further straining resources as communities struggle to care for sick individuals. Shockingly, research shows “67% of children’s calories come from empty ultra processed foods” in the U.S. (Berg, 2022).

Food additives– “any substance not normally consumed as the food itself and not normally used as a typical ingredient of the food, whether or not it has nutritive value” (FAO, Codex Alimentarius, 2021)– frequently found in UPFs, present a myriad of concerns including central nervous system disruptions, hyperactivity or other behavioral or neurological issues in children. (Health Effects Assessment: Potential Neurobehavioral Effects of Synthetic Food Dyes in Children, 2021

Predatory marketing lulls families into believing that these convenient food sources are not harmful. Information and research about the toxicities and harm is usually assigned to the small print or not disclosed at all. 

The Environmental Working Group (EWG) has published information on several food additives that are especially troubling. These include:

  • Nitrates and nitrites- meat preservatives  linked to stomach cancer, esophageal cancer, and possibly brain and thyroid cancers
  • Propyl paraben- a preservative in pastries shown to cause developmental and reproductive harm.
  • Food dyes (especially red and yellow dyes) linked to cancers
  • Potassium bromate- carcinogen found in baked goods
  • BHT and BHA- preservatives in foods are possible carcinogens
  • Titanium dioxide- color additive implicated in DNA damage
  • PFAS- known as forever chemicals used in food packaging which has been shown to leach into foods. These are known to increase the risk of cancer, damage to the immune system and hormone disruption. 
Food additives’ impact on environmental health 

According to Lempart-Rapacewicz, et al, the latest literature classifies food additives as one of the groups of so-called Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CECs), defined by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and United States Geological Survey (USGS).

These chemicals are not naturally occurring, and so require manufacturing resources ie; water, energy, systems for disposal of by-products and waste and packaging materials, to either develop or alter the final product.  Pollution of our air and water are well documented consequences of this type of manufacturing. 

These  substances are also found in sewage where current processes are unable to remove them from the systems, leading to concerns of the micropollutants in the ground and water tables. 

Additives such as ascorbic acid might sound harmless, but when found in large quantities,  alters the pH of water and soil, affecting the basic growing medium for plants and crops. Ongoing research investigates the long-term consequences on plant and crop properties and the effects on biodiversity. Some studies have found mutagenic and teratogenic effects on fish and aquatic vegetation after exposure to food additives. ( Lempart-Rapacewicz, et al, 2023)

Plastic ingestion

Infants and children can be especially susceptible to  exposure to micro or nano plastics–plastics so small they are measured in micrometers or nanometers (microplastics are plastic particles under 5 millimeters in size, and nanoplastics are under 0.001 millimeters in size). They’ve been detected in many of the foods we eat,  in the air we breathe and the water we drink. Micro and nanoplastics are absorbed into our bodies through food packaging or in infants and children through feeding bottles and teats, baby food containers and pouches. Significantly more particles are released when the food containers are heated in the microwave (Hussain, et al, 2023).

Photo by Zeesy Grossbaum on Unsplash

The health effects of ingesting plastics are not completely understood yet, but early research implicates micro and nano plastics in imbalances in the microbiome, altered lipid metabolism, reproductive system, brain and lung dysfunctions. 

More on environmental degradation

In 1962,  Rachel Carson wrote the groundbreaking book Silent Spring, sounding the alarm about the use of pesticides and herbicides. Concerningly, as a nation, we have yet to heed her warnings. 

Use of these powerful chemicals is negatively impacting plants by causing them to produce less phytonutrients– the vitamins and minerals we need to stay healthy. 

Scientists are finding “dead zones” in bodies of water, areas that are so polluted they can no longer sustain aquatic animals and plants on account of run off of these toxins. Disruptions in the ecosystems have led to the rapidly changing climate and instability of our weather patterns.

Since the publishing of Carson’s book, micro and nano plastics have been found to inhibit the growth of healthy microbiota in aquatic animals and have also been shown to obstruct the digestive system of marine organisms such as mussels and oysters. 

Scientists note increasing contamination of agricultural soils with these particles, reducing plant growth and overall productivity (Amboyne, et al, 2021). Soil contamination negatively affects inhabitants such as earthworms and nematodes resulting in changes in the soil microbiome.

Learning to live in balance
Photo by Derek Owens on Unsplash

On an individual level, tackling the catastrophic challenges spurred by the way we produce and consume food, is insurmountable and requires system-level action;  however, there are resources for families to consult when working to make the healthiest choices for their families. Beyond breastfeeding,  families can check out theEWG’s  “Dirty Dozen” and “Clean 15” listing of foods to find the most budget-friendly way to provide cleaner, organic foods. There is no question that organic foods are the healthiest. 

When we learn to live in balance with the natural world, the health of both flourishes.  It can sometimes seem an uphill battle to create a cleaner, greener world but as individuals, and collectively, it is our privilege and responsibility to do whatever we can. One person at a time, one family at a time, one community at a time. One of my life-long favorite quotes is from Margaret Mead, and it is as important now as when she wrote it in 1978: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed it is the only thing that ever has”. This seems to be the time for those committed to caring for mothers and babies to also commit to caring for Mother Earth as well.

More resources to consult

Global Nutrition Report 

Green Feeding Tool

IBFAN’s Health and Environmental Impacts

Report on CARBON FOOTPRINT DUE TO MILK FORMULA: A study from selected countries of the Asia-Pacific region

Register to attend  Infant and Young Child Feeding in Emergencies: Preparedness Systems for Communities to Keep Our Babies Safe webinar hosted by U.S. Breastfeeding Committee (USBC) and the National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) on November 1 from 2:00 – 3:30 pm ET. The session will provide an overview of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) infant and young child feeding in emergencies (IYCF-E) toolkit, share current research exploring personal experiences and disaster-related factors that influence breastfeeding, describe how NACCHO has supported communities in emergency preparedness for maternal and child population.



Breastfeeding is not binary.

–This post is part of our 10-year anniversary series “Breastfeeding is…” When we initially curated this series, we planned for 10 weeks, but breastfeeding is so many things that we just couldn’t fit it all in.  Thus, two bonus weeks in our anniversary series! — 

Breastfeeding is not binary.

There’s solid evidence that direct breastfeeding offers the most protective and beneficial effects to mothers, babies and ultimately society.

Photo by Luiza Braun on Unsplash

When breastfeeding, a baby’s saliva transfers chemicals to their mother’s body that causes her milk to adjust to meet the changing needs of the baby. [Al-Shehri, et al 2015]

Even more fascinating, the combination of baby saliva and fresh breastmilk generates enough hydrogen peroxide to inhibit growth of Staphylococcus and Salmonella. Read about the science behind it all here.

Breastfeeding encourages proper mouth and jaw development and promotes oral health. 

When babies breastfeed, they are less likely to become obese for reasons like self-regulation of milk intake and seeding of their gut microbiomes. [Pérez-Escamilla, 2016] 

Infants at the breast, compared to bottle-fed infants, have better heart and respiratory rates and higher oxygen saturation rates because breastfeeding consumes less energy.

Photo by Zach Vessels on Unsplash

Breastfeeding has implications on mother-infant bonding and children’s future behavior. One study found that “compared to children whose mothers breastfed them, children who were not breastfed showed an increased number of internalizing behavioral problems, particularly anxious/depressed and somatic symptoms… A duration effect (dosage effect) appeared such that breastfeeding for 10 months or longer had the strongest impact on reducing anxious/depressed and somatic symptoms in children.”

Direct breastfeeding does not require feeding paraphernalia that may be vectors for disease. 

Even if the contents of a bottle contain human milk, the effects achieved through direct breastfeeding may not be possible.  

However, the reality of families’ lives, and sometimes choice, mean that most babies in the U.S. will not exclusively breastfeed or go on to breastfeed in conjunction with appropriate complementary feeding as recommended.

Photo by Lucas Margoni on Unsplash

The most recent CDC Breastfeeding Report Card acknowledges, “Numerous barriers to breastfeeding remain, and disparities persist in breastfeeding duration and exclusivity rates by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Policy, systems, and environmental changes that address breastfeeding barriers, such as better maternity care practices, paid leave policies, and supportive ECE centers, can help to improve breastfeeding rates and reduce disparities.” 

For these reasons and others, infant feeding often takes many forms. Infant feeding in America is not either/or, it’s both/and

Fiona Jardine and Aiden Farrow present experiences that do not fit into how we often generalize the infant feeding experience. 

Universal pumping icon by Fiona Jardine

Jardine’s work follows those who exclusively pump human milk. Farrow too pumped milk for their child born with cleft complications and then went on to directly chestfeed their baby.

Farrow has explained: “Feeding methods are not mutually exclusive. There are always windows and doors.” 

Lactation care providers, other care providers, health policies and procedures must all acknowledge the incredibly diverse experiences of families while honoring the very ubiquitous human desire that we all want what’s best for our babies.   

___

Our 10-year anniversary giveaway has ended. Thank you to everyone who participated!

Colorado pediatric office becomes breastfeeding friendly employer

Castle Rock Pediatrics (CRP) made a splash this summer at the Douglas County Fair Parade where they displayed their incredible Under the Sea themed float. Patients and families created a colorful array of paper plate fish that “swam” through pool noodle crafted seaweed.

CRP also attended the  Renaissance Expeditionary Magnet School Back to School Carnival and the Downtown Castle Rock Concert Under the Lights where they set up a lactation station.

After breastfeeding her own young children and later completing the Lactation Counselor Training Course (LCTC), Laura Westover PA-C, CLC, one of the providers at CRP, dove into helping transform her office into a Breastfeeding-Friendly Employer and soon-to-be Breastfeeding- Friendly Medical Office.

Their work is supported by a grant through the Tri-County Health Department. Westover has been working alongside Susan Howk, a breastfeeding policy specialist, to create their policies and lactation spaces through a six-point plan which includes policy, staff and provider training, patient education, environment, evaluation and sustainability, and continuity of care.

The grant has funded things like a chair, end tables, a hospital-grade multi user breast pump and kits, a stuffed animal nursing dog with her puppies for siblings to play with, and a lactation scale for weighted feeds.

Westover displays the breastfeeding friendly employer certificate in March 2022 standing in their first lactation space.

Their lactation space started in one of their smallest exam rooms, but has recently graduated to one of their larger exam rooms, which is now near the end of its renovation. Westover notes that the space also functions for newborn and young baby visits.

Westover reports that CRP owners since November 2021 Drs. Anderson and Bouchillon have been highly supportive of the breastfeeding-friendly changes.

Prior to the implementation of their lactation policies, Westover says their office “was not lactation friendly at all.” She describes stacks of formula in plain view.

“It gave the impression that we were promoting formula,” she comments.

Gift bags for patients were also riddled with formula-promotions, so the team phased out the branded materials and replaced them for non-branded, breastfeeding-friendly items.

Now, Westover and her colleague Sydney Gruenhaupt RN-BSN, CLC  see breastfeeding dyads weekly for office visits; whereas they once had to refer out. Of mothers’ main concerns are poor weight gain and uncomfortable or painful latch.

Westover points out that Colorado has very high breastfeeding initiation rates, but like the national trend, tapers dramatically at 6 months and beyond. While Westover and her colleagues are not currently tracking their office’s breastfeeding rates, it’s part of the plan in hopes that their numbers will hold steady beyond initiation rates. Westover explains since they’ve switched over to a larger electronic medical records system, there should be potential for a simple, infant feeding tracking system. A 2016 project by the County of San Diego Healthy Works program, implemented by UC San Diego Center for Community Health with funding from First 5 San Diego extensively explores current practices and future possibilities of  breastfeeding measurement in the outpatient electronic health record.

Westover and her colleagues will be out and about again this fall where they’ll craft their  lactation tent at events like Oktoberfest and the town of Castle Rock Spooktacular Halloween celebration.

“[It’s] really wonderful because we are able to promote [to] the whole community,” Westover shares.

For more about CRP’s lactation services visit https://castlerockpediatrics.com/Services/Additional-Services .

Empathy in architecture

A friend of mine works in a healthcare building; her office, windowless. Stark white walls frame the shiny tiled floors in the also windowless laboratory that surrounds her office. Rectangular fluorescent lighting looms eerily overhead. Working in this space for the majority of her waking hours amounts to constant longing for sunshine and an overall agitated demeanor. I imagine the architect of this space wasn’t much of an empath.

Photo by Robert Katzki on Unsplash

This effect is being documented in a growing body of research demonstrating how color, texture and patterns affect human emotions.

Generally, humans are quite robot-like, performing our daily duties without a great deal of attention paid to the building structures, layouts or designs that we move through. 

“When we don’t notice the built environment, it’s silently affirming our right to be there, our value to society. When we do, too often it is because it’s telling us we don’t belong. Those messages can be so subtle that we don’t recognize them for what they are,” Kim Tingley writes, later quoting architect Joel Sanders: “‘We sleepwalk our way through the world…Unless a building interior is strikingly different or lavish or unusual, we are unaware of it.’” 

The first time I saw a lactation pod at an airport– unusual at the time– I had mixed emotions. Part of me became excited that this was an option for traveling, lactating, pumping, and breastfeeding people, but most of me scoffed, annoyed, thinking something along the lines of: “Of course breastfeeding moms would be given this messaging to go hide themselves away from the public eye.” 

What Tingley wrote, that our built environment affirms our right to be in a space, affirms our value to society, is certainly a powerful concept. 

The COVID pandemic has forced us to think more about the built spaces we move through, adding layers to this idea of how and what and who we value.  

In a recent episode of Uniquely Milwaukee Salam Fatayer of 88Nine Radio Milwaukee poses the question: “What could our city, neighborhoods and community spaces look like if they were created based on people’s emotional, psychological and social needs?”

Photo by Coasted Media on Unsplash

Local architects and scholars answer with ideas about how they’re supporting the users of the spaces they create, with the goal of making sure people feel safe, at peace and nurtured by those built environments. 

On Our Milky Way, we’ve had the honor of highlighting the work of those thinking about how built spaces affect birth, lactation and beyond. 

For example, in conjunction with the Institute of Patient-Centered Design, Inc., The MomFriendly Network created The Lactation Design program which consists of research and outreach projects to enable the Institute to contribute design resources that  improve accommodations to support breastfeeding. Read more about this project here: https://www.ourmilkyway.org/physical-environment-influences-breastfeeding-outcomes/ 

Renée Flacking and her colleagues’ work, Closeness and separation in neonatal intensive care, explores how architecture influences outcomes in neonatal units. Single-family room designs are increasingly replacing traditional open-bay units for reasons documented in their paper.

Source: United States Breastfeeding Committee (USBC)

“This architectural structure provides the family with an opportunity to be with their child in the neonatal intensive care unit day and night providing facilities for parents’ basic needs including the need for privacy. This design has been suggested to be associated with a lower rate of hospital-acquired infections, similar to single patient rooms in adult intensive care (48), earlier full enteral nutrition, higher breastfeeding rates and a more soothing environment with, for example, lower ambient sound levels (49). As this design has been shown to reduce the length of stay in hospital significantly, for example, by 10 days in preterm infant below 30 weeks of gestation in a Swedish study (50), it shortens the time of separation for the infant from the home and family. Parents have reported that they felt that a single family room design in a NICU facilitated their presence with their infant (51), but the increase in parent–infant closeness gained by a single family room model during hospital care is not well documented in scientific literature.”

Read Our Milky Way’s coverage on this concept here

In stark contrast, attorney Leah Margulies recently shared in Protecting Breastfeeding in the United States: Time for Action on The Code that formula companies provide architectural designs to maternity care facilities in a deliberate attempt to separate dyads, making bonding and breastfeeding difficult and consequently,  families more likely to become reliant on their artificial products. It’s a sickening example of how the industry saturates our systems, down to the skeletons of our buildings.

Photo credit: Henrico County Public Library

Venturing beyond the very early postpartum period, it’s exciting to explore how community spaces are supporting young families. The Henrico County Public Library – Fairfield Area Library is accommodating families with their Computer Work + Play Stations which were conceptualized by library staff and materialized by architects at Quinn Evans and TMC Furniture staff. Read more about that inspiration and process here

Supporting lactation and breastfeeding in the workplace is a vital part of ensuring that lactating individuals feel valued. Setting up lactation spaces sometimes calls for innovation and creativity. You can explore our collection of stories about workplace accommodations in the stories below: 

CLC advances breastfeeding protection and support in the workplace

Workplace supports breastfeeding mother of triplets

Making Breastfeeding the Norm through The Breastfeeding Family-Friendly Community Designation (BFCD)

Alameda sergeant improves lactation space and support in county

Artist celebrates working mothers with ‘Liquid Gold’ project

Worksite program caters to nursing moms

Photo credit: Meredith W. Gonçalves

 

Pulling back the lens further, the architecture of communities themselves influences well-being too. One of the effects of redlining is poor health outcomes. Part of this equation involves the placement of industrial buildings and factories. Vann R. Newkirk II points out in Trump’s EPA Concludes Environmental Racism Is Real that The National Center for Environmental Assessment released a study indicating that BIPOC are much more likely to live near polluters and breathe polluted air. “Specifically, the study finds that people in poverty are exposed to more fine particulate matter than people living above poverty,” he writes.  

NICHQ hosts a webinar The Residual Impact of Historical Structural Inequities: Connecting Residential Segregation and Mortgage Discrimination to Current Infant Mortality and Breastfeeding Rates where maternal child health experts including speakers Jaye Clement, MPH, MPP, Brittney Francis, MPH, Kiddada Green, MAT, Arthur James, MD and Jessica Roach, LPN, BA, MPH share examples for supporting efforts to reduce infant mortality and improve maternal and infant health. 

Circling back to Tingley’s piece, the article raises the concern that although we’re equipped with knowledge about how under-resourced populations are being affected by current structures and practices,  “funding earmarked for expanding inclusivity [may] be diverted toward making existing facilities safer for those they already privilege.” 

Drawing on Sanders’ work, Tingley writes,  “Throughout history… the built environment has reflected and reinforced inequality by physically separating one group from another, often in the presumed interests of health or safety. Women-only bathrooms, so designated by men, supposedly preserved their innocence and chastity; white-only bathrooms separated their users from supposedly less ‘clean’ black people. It’s no coincidence that Covid-19 has disproportionately sickened and killed members of demographic groups — people who are black, Indigenous and Latino; who are homeless; who are immigrants — that have been targets of systemic segregation that increased their vulnerability. It’s also not hard to imagine the pandemic, and a person’s relative risk of infection, being used to justify new versions of these discriminatory practices.”

Art by Liz Richter, Photo by Leslie Rodriguez
Find more of Richter’s art here: https://www.lizrichterart.com/public-art

In this vein, Glenn Gamboa details where some funding gets funneled in a piece published this spring. 

“Twelve national environmental grant makers awarded $1.34 billion to organizations in the Gulf and Midwest regions in 2016 and 2017, according to a 2020 study by The New School’s Tishman Environment and Design Center. But only about 1% of it — roughly $18 million — was awarded to groups that are dedicated to environmental justice.” 

The climate crisis is an accelerating threat that is both affected by and affects architecture. 

“Architecture has to mediate between the perceived needs of the moment versus the unknowable needs of the future; between the immediate needs of our bodies and the desire to create something that will outlast generations,” Tingley goes on to write. 

Across the globe, architects push to be “mindful of their projects’ environmental impacts and resilience, including an emphasis on upcycling, the use of solar power, better building practices, and, of course, structural longevity,” Alyssa Giacobbe writes.  [More on ecological design here.] 

Alongside resilience and sustainability, there must be a focus on design that specifically serves mothers and their children. Mothers are too often left out, unseen, underserved despite there being about two billion of us worldwide, with an increasing likelihood of women becoming mothers

Photo by Dimitry Anikin on Unsplash

Lisa Wong Macabasco puts it this way: “Although the experience of human reproduction touches all of us at least once in our lives, its effects remain taboo, under-researched and excluded from exhibitions and publications covering architecture and design history and practice. In these spheres, maternity is treated furtively or as unimportant, even as it defines the everyday experiences of many – some 6 million Americans are pregnant at any given time.” 

It isn’t surprising that “design for children, design for healthy spaces, design for those with disabilities, care of and for their colleagues – these discussions and follow through are happening largely through female-led firms and initiatives,”  Julia Gamolina comments in The Unspoken Burden on Women in Architecture

In an exciting development, Wong Macabasco describes design historians Amber Winick and Michelle Millar Fisher’s Designing Motherhood, “a first-of-its-kind exploration of the arc of human reproduction through the lens of design. Their endeavor encompasses a book, a series of exhibitions and public programs in Philadelphia, and a design curriculum taught at the University of Pennsylvania.” 

This is exciting, and it’s progress. But as Wong Macabasco quotes Juliana Rowen Barton– architecture and design historian and curator who also helped organize Designing Motherhood– “Progress is not the fact that this show happened – progress is these conversations continuing to happen.” 

Designing Motherhood is on view at the Mutter Museum in Philadelphia through this month of May 2022.

Musings on unity beyond National Breastfeeding Month

This year’s National Breastfeeding Month (NBM) celebration has come to an end, but our momentum as maternal child health advocates– striving for equitable care for all– powers on. 

The 2020 NBM theme, Many Voices United, called on us to come together to identify and implement the policy and system changes that are needed to ensure that all families have the support and resources they need in order to feed their babies healthily. 

Photo by Tim Mossholder on Unsplash
Colorful Hands 1 of 3 / George Fox students Annabelle Wombacher, Jared Mar, Sierra Ratcliff and Benjamin Cahoon collaborated on the mural. / Article: https://www.orartswatch.org/painting-the-town-in-newberg/

Achieving this shared goal requires daily self-work and individual introspection so that our collective can be as effective as ever. No matter how socially-conscious, open-minded, anti-racist, (insert adjective), we think we may be, we still have learned biases and prejudices that require near constant attention. Much like I remind my children to brush their teeth every morning and every night, as a white, binary woman, I must remind myself to examine my biases and my privilege daily.  

With NBM’s theme of unity in mind, this Upworthy video features an art installation that demonstrates our society’s interconnectedness. With a piece of string, the installation shows an intricate, densely-woven web created by individuals wrapping thread around 32 poles with identifiers arranged in a circle. 

“You can see that even though we all have different experiences and we all identify in different ways…We are really one,” the project’s creator says in the video. 

The sentiment and the product are truly beautiful and fascinating. While appreciating the beauty of unity, it’s important to keep our critical thinking and progressive attitude sharp, refraining from slipping into too comfortable a space where change cannot happen.  

Recently, I’ve seen a few statements on unity circulating social media that I’d like to embrace with a “Yes!” Instead, I find myself reacting, “Yes! But…” 

My worry is that these well-intentioned mantras we live by– much like some might argue certain microaggressions are well-intentioned– are also dismissive. 

  1. We all bleed the same blood. 
  1. Children are not born racist.
  1. I will teach my child to love your child. Period. 

Let’s break those down starting with “We all bleed the same blood.”  Some things to consider:

First, Ashley May for The Thirbly writes,

“Black breasts do not exist separate from Black bodies and the situated existence we navigate in this world nor the racialized experience of motherhood. Racism and classism intertwine to act as a containment, working to make some of us feel as if we are walking in quicksand. Add to this the complexities of new motherhood and the needs of the postpartum body and now we have a cocktail for failure. Literal milk plugs. So, although her precious body may be able to produce milk, her situation prevents her and her baby from receiving it. Even the intention to breastfeed cannot save the milk of the mother who cannot find time for pump breaks as she works the night shift as a security guard. Or, perhaps she cannot figure out why pumping is not working, but she doesn’t have the time to seek the educational or financial resources to help her problem solve.” (underline added by OMW) 

Racism affects People of Color (POC) at a cellular level. Studies show that the experience of racial discrimination accelerates the shortening of telomeres (the repetitive sequences of DNA at the ends of chromosomes that protect the cell) and ultimately contributes to an increase in people’s risks of developing diseases. 

It’s epigenetics; the environments POC of are growing in affect their biology.  

Children are not born racist, but white children are born into a racist society that they will benefit from. 

From the very beginning, white children have a better chance of survival than Children of Color; African Americans have 2.3 times the infant mortality rate as non-Hispanic whites

What’s more, Black children are three times more likely to die when cared for by white doctors, while the mortality rate for white babies is largely unaffected by the doctor’s race, a recent study found. 

White children are born into being part of the problem and just the same, can be part of equitable solutions. 

I will teach my child to love your child. Period. 

Love is action, and even if it’s easier said than done, there are so many ways to teach our children about race, inequities and injustice. Afterall, “If Black children are ‘old enough’ to experience racism then white children are ‘old enough’ to learn about it.” – Blair Amadeus Imani

  • Be careful what you say. As a young girl on my way to ballet class one day, my mom, while locking the car doors,  pointed out the barred doors and boarded windows in the neighborhood we rolled through. 

“That’s how you know this is not a safe neighborhood,” my mom warned me. 

No questions asked, I noted the building facades, and then I noted the Black people. Because there wasn’t any further conversation, I made the connection that Black people must be “not safe” and ultimately, that there must be something wrong with Black people if they’re confined to neighborhoods “like this.” 

Imagine the impact we could make if we showed our children that there is nothing inherently wrong with Black people that ending racism can’t solve.

As a nation we are apathetic, made apparent by a recent poll. The survey shows that only 30 percent of white people have taken concrete action to better understand racial issues after George Floyd’s killing. 

The poll also shows that White Americans are also the least likely to support the Black Lives Matter movement, with 47 percent expressing support.

Is it because we don’t claim it as our problem? Is it because we misunderstand the problem? Is it because it’s easier to point fingers at others than ourselves? 

I’d like to leave you with this video of writer Kimberly Jones where she provides a brief history of the American economy told through an analogy using the board game Monopoly. I urge you to watch it, and then watch it again, and again, and again. 

There is no time for complacency within these truly abhorrent systems. When we start to lose sight of that, envision the tangle of yarn from the aforementioned unity art installation and remember that vastly different experiences are networked together.