Late this autumn, I went for a hike with my family that moved me to tears. As I looked over the rolling foothills cascading in green, its beauty, while simultaneously reflecting on the horrors in this world, provoked a surge of emotion like the swell of ocean waves just over the mountain range we perched upon.
I shared this experience with one of my dearest mentors and she replied: “I also find nature a powerful midwife and teacher about life. I remember being moved to tears by redwoods standing firm bearing deep gouges and gaping wounds from lightning strikes and subsequent fires… yet continuing to grow and foster another generation.”
When I returned to my neglected inbox after this respite hiking and exploring new-to-me land, I came across the juxtaposed images of a human fingerprint and the dissection of a tree trunk suggesting that ‘we are nature’.
With my mentor’s poetry in mind and the concept of “human nature,” I’d like to invite you to explore the following happenings, documents and projects as they all pertain to the inextricable connection between planetary and human health and the influence of infant and young child feeding practices on greater population health, a concept coined One Health.
First up, the 46th Session of the Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC46) came to a close this month. The CAC is a UN body established by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) in 1963 with a mission to protect consumer health and promote fair practices in food trade.
The International Baby Food Action Network (IBFAN) participated in the session, and as the organization reports: “After more than a decade of challenging negotiations within the industry-dominant Nutrition Committee, the Revision of the 1987 Follow-up Formula Standard has been officially adopted this week – now renamed the Standard for Follow-up Formula for Older Infants and Product for Young Children.
Thanks to the relentless advocacy efforts of IBFAN, WHO, UNICEF, public interest NGOs, Brazil, Ecuador, Nigeria, and numerous [other] countries, the new standard now makes specific references to the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes and relevant WHA Resolutions in a Preamble. Despite sustained opposition from the USA, these safeguards were retained during CAC, although some of IBFAN’s warnings were removed from the CAC46 report.”
You can find more detailed coverage at the Baby Milk Action blog here.
Also this month, WHO hosted a webinar covering the release of the new WHO guideline for complementary feeding of infants and young children 6-23 months of age.
Dr. Francesco Branca began by pointing out some hopeful news.
“The past decade we have seen important gains in improving maternal and child nutrition, including a one-third decline in the proportion of children suffering from stunting, and a tend point increase in exclusive breastfeeding on the way to reaching the 2025 World Health Assembly nutrition target of 50 percent of infants below six months exclusively breastfed. Yet multiple forms of malnutrition, poor growth, micronutrient deficiencies and overweight continue to jeopardize children’s ability to survive and thrive…”
Dr. Larry Grummer-Strawn summarized that while some of what is in the report is repetitive, there are several key updates.
- “Milks 6–11 months: for infants 6–11 months of age who are fed milks other than breast milk, either milk formula or animal milk can be fed… Milks 12–23 months: for young children 12–23 months of age who are fed milks other than breast milk, animal milk should be fed. Follow-up formulas are not recommended… (p. 15)
- “Starchy staple foods should be minimized. They commonly comprise a large component of complementary feeding diets, particularly in low resource settings, and do not provide proteins of the same quality as those found in animal source foods and are not good sources of critical nutrients such as iron, zinc and Vitamin B12. Many also include anti-nutrients that reduce nutrient absorption. (p. 24)
- “Foods high in sugar, salt and trans fats should not be consumed… Sugar-sweetened beverages should not be consumed… Non-sugar sweeteners should not be consumed…Consumption of 100% fruit juice should be limited…” (p.32)
There is also an emphasis on responsive feeding (pages 43 to 47).
Around 38 minutes into the recording of the webinar, Grummer-Strawn recognizes the reality of consumption of unhealthy food and beverages, the convenience of UPFs and calls on the need for broad policy actions to protect child health.
Finally, Conference of Parties (COP) 28 wrapped up this month. At COP27, Healthy Children Project’s (HCP) Karin Cadwell presented research on the environmental impact of powdered baby formula milks in North America and HCP’s Kajsa Brimdyr on skin-to-skin contact (SSC) in the first hour after birth as a simple and easy, inexpensive, appropriate for all dyads with countless benefits intervention. (Read more coverage here.)
Notable from this year’s session, among other important endeavors, includes work by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) like the Children, Cities and Climate Action Lab and a partnership to understand how floods and heat driven by climate change affect the delivery of maternal and child health care in Brazil and Zambia.
For further reading on climate action, check out Hidden Brain’s newsletter blurb:
“Psychologists have studied how to raise awareness about climate change and get people to take action on the issue. The answer can vary depending on a range of factors, like culture, age, gender, political ideology — the list goes on. An international team of scientists behind a recent paper has created a tool that shows which messages and interventions are most effective with different demographics. ‘To maximize their impact, policymakers and advocates can assess which messaging is most promising for their publics,’ said study co-author Kimberly Doell, who also helped lead the project. Check out the tool for yourself here.”