Continuing the conversation about language use in perinatal health

What is ‘appropriate’ language? What one might consider distasteful, hurtful, impactful, another may consider harmless or meaningless.

Photo by Miguel Á. Padriñán

Take this exchange offered by Ravae Sinclair, JD, CD (DONA), LCCE at the early 2020 International Breastfeeding Conference for example:

A white-presenting lactation professional working with a black mother and her baby shortly after birth exclaimed something along the lines of, “Awww, look at him, he looks just like a little thug!” commenting on the slight sag in his newborn hospital cap.

“Little thug”– a heavily loaded term generally carrying negative connotations– was understandably a trigger for the mother. She shut down no longer feeling safe in the space and asked to be discharged early. Most likely, the lactation professional did not intend to offend, but the impact of this short exchange has much further reaching consequences than the intention itself.

We have explored the impact of language to a relatively great extent here on Our Milky Way. You can check out these pieces for examples:

In a recent exchange, Nikki Lee added to this ongoing conversation about language in maternal child health. She shared an observation about how “the media rarely misses a chance to plant negative seeds in the public’s mind about breastfeeding”.

Citing an example from a PubMed alert that morning– Sudden Death in a Breastfeeding Woman with Arrhythmogenic Mitral Valve Prolapse— Lee commented “I ask you, how in the world does the infant feeding method have to do with the death of this mother? She had some kind of cardiac defect; pregnancy and labor place huge stresses on the cardiovascular system. What would you think and how would you feel if you saw a headline ‘Sudden death in a formula feeding woman with arrhythmogenic mitral valve prolapse’?”

Julie Smith’s, et al 2008 paper Voldemortand health professional knowledge of breastfeeding – do journal titles and abstracts accurately convey findings on differential health outcomes for formula fed infants?  “showed a surprising ‘Voldemort effect’ in the studies examined; formula feeding was rarely named as an exposure increasing health risk in publication titles or abstracts.” The authors conclude that “ If widespread, this skew in communication of research findings may reduce health professionals’ knowledge and support for breastfeeding.”

In her own reflection on the use of language in perinatal support, Donna Walls, RN, BSN, ANLC shares her guest post Our words need to send a supportive message- how can we do it? this week on Our Milky Way.

——

As a child I often repeated “sticks and stones can break my bones, but words can never hurt me”. As an adult, I know this is not true. Words are powerful. In our breastfeeding advocacy world, words can be used to build a new mother’s confidence, or they can be used to undermine it. Below, I offer you some of my pet peeves,  words and phrases we commonly use without  thinking about their impact.

Source: United States Breastfeeding Committee

First, maybe the most common and certainly one of the most harmful is talking about “milk coming in”. We know that the number one fear of new moms, especially first-time moms, is not having enough milk. In the first days after birth,  there aren’t often  visible signs of milk production. New parents have often heard about engorgement and how breasts get so full, they look like they are ready to explode. But, they see no signs of exploding breasts in the first one to two days after birth. They may be able to express drops which is encouraging but no big reassurance that there is plenty for their baby.

We often see at about two days of age the occurrence of “cluster feeding” when their quiet, precious newborn seems ravenous and so, so hungry. Many moms think, or unfortunately are told, that this is a sign of not having enough milk. This is not even slightly, vaguely true but rather a normal newborn feeding pattern. We dutifully tell this anxious mother not to worry; her “milk will come in” in a day or two. The not-so-subtle message is that there is no need to worry about not having milk now, that  it soon will come in.

What has happened is that we have reinforced her biggest worry about not being able to adequately feed her baby. I don’t believe for a minute that this is intentional on our part, really just one of those things we have always said and never really examined the consequences.

I sometimes feel sorry for underappreciated, often ignored colostrum. Maybe it’s time we change the language. So instead of saying “your milk will come in”, might I suggest we instead say “the milk you’ve been making for your baby while you were pregnant is there for the first feeds. It is newborn milk, sometimes called colostrum, and this small volume is all your baby needs in the first hours and days. When you nurse frequently in these first days the newborn milk will change over to mature milk and you will see an increase in the amount as your breasts will become fuller, firmer and heavier.” You can of course  come up with your own wording just as long as new parents get the message that there is milk NOW- not “coming in” later!

Source: United States Breastfeeding Committee

My second pet peeve is judgey diagnoses of flat nipples. Way too often when prenatal breast assessments are done, there is a diagnosis of flat nipples, usually based only on the appearance with no regard to assessing function. Once these misunderstood nipples are labeled, the mother is deemed not quite right for feeding. Silly exercises and gadgets are recommended to make already elastic skin behave appropriately. First point: nipples are erectile by nature, some stand up a lot, some a little. Sadly most new mothers have seen artificial nipples and think they should look like these, not ever recognizing that we have the real nipples so why aren’t bottle nipples more like ours?! When counseling mothers, ask the mom if she notices her nipple erecting in cold weather or with sexual/manual stimulation.

As a clinical lactation care provider for many years, I would often be saddened by the words used to make a mother feel her nipples weren’t quite right, not good enough. I have seen too often women struggling with breastfeeding because they were told even before the baby’s birth that the chances were slim for successful breastfeeding; bad nipples would certainly cause problems.

I am quite sure males are not discouraged about the abilities of their erectile tissue at the onset of sexual activity. This is not to say that there may not be challenges  with inverted nipples; they may cause challenges  when they are retracted enough to not ever be stimulated or stretched for hormonal release, but flat nipples will evert. They just want to do it their way. We need to remind moms that the nipple their baby will prefer is attached to their favorite person.

Third, let’s talk about the term engorgement. By definition, engorgement  is not normal. It is a state brought on by interruptions in the expected initiation of lactation [Source]. Unfortunately, the term is used by professionals and families to mean a fullness in the breasts. Signs of engorgement include hot, reddened, uncomfortably swollen breasts which can be hard for a newborn to correctly latch to the breast. This needs to be distinguished from normal signs of lactation when breasts become rounder, fuller, firmer and heavier. Too often a mother may complain about her breast “engorgement” and interventions are recommended to help reduce the discomfort and swelling when in reality she just needs to be reassured that what she is feeling is normal and actually a good sign that she is producing milk. So, my request is that when a mother talks about her concerns about engorgement, our response needs to be to ask something along the lines of “what exactly are you feeling?” as well as the usual questions of frequency of feedings, adequate output and signs of comfortable  latch.

Source: United States Breastfeeding Committee

Our words can have a profound effect on the success or failure of breastfeeding. A huge part of our job, our responsibility to our patients and their families is to build confidence in their ability to nourish and nurture their newborns. Be aware of the message that is being sent and choose words that will build confidence, be generous with realistic praise and couch our intervention suggestions with success in mind. Ask for parents’ input; we want them to know their thoughts are important to the process!

Reference Cadwell, K. and Turner-Maffei, C.  Pocket Guide for Lactation Management. 2022. Jones and Bartlett. Burlington, MA.

Conflicts of interest everywhere one turns

The authors of Call to end sponsorship from commercial milk formula companies published in The Lancet last month urge all health-care professional associations (HCPAs) to commit to ending sponsorships from companies that market commercial milk formulas (CMFs) by the end of 2024.

Greed depicted in an image that is part of a series of prints of the Seven Deadly Sins, engraved by Pieter van der Heyden after drawings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder. More at https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/338698

The CMF industry targets healthcare providers, because they understand providers’ influence on parents’ decisions.

The group of leading HCPAs  is working to compile case studies, references, guidance on how to manage without sponsorship, and more to help any associations in ending such relationships. 

The effort is not a restriction on parental choice, and the authors recognize that all healthcare professionals (HCPs) must support parents on a case-by-case basis. 

Instead, this work focuses on combating the inappropriate marketing of CMFs which interferes with parents getting accurate information to make decisions. The 2023 Lancet Series offers much more information on the industry’s tactics. Find it here.

The CMF industry has its tentacles tangled in affairs beyond the health care provider-patient relationship, raising concerns about conflicts of interest everywhere one turns. 

Healthy Children Project’s Karin Cadwell, PhD, RN, FAAN, ANLC, CLC, IBCLC points out that other fields have separated themselves from industry.  For instance, the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) will not accredit an organization that it defines as a commercial interest. The American Medical Student Association (AMSA) adopted policies opposing gifts to physicians and medical students from the pharmaceutical industry in the early 2000s. This piece describes some of the more recent policies governing physician interactions with industry. 

Yet, formula companies and breast pump companies are right in the middle of the baby feeding arena at conferences, like at  WIC (Women, Infants, and Children) and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). 

Industry at conferences 

Rob Revelette MD, PhD FAAP questions the AAP’s relationship with formula companies in this essay where he notes that the AAP, both at the national and state level, accepts money from formula companies for advertising and sponsorship of meetings.https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/335169

Greed Breaks the Bag (“La codicia rompe el saco”)
Leonardo Alenza y Nieto Spanish
1807–45
https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/335169

Saroj Jayasinghe offers in Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship of academic conferences: ethics of conflict of interest, “The most definite way to prevent COI is to completely avoid industry funding of conferences…” 

Because this isn’t always feasible, Jayasinghe writes, it is crucial to establish these proposed guidelines:  “(1) avoid the sponsors having any influence on the decision-making of conference; (2) avoid promotion of specific products; (3) transparency of sponsorship; (4) develop guidelines for future interactions; (5) consider contextual factors such as the trust in the profession and social roles of physicians; (6) ensure that the long-term objective of the organisations is independent of influences of the industry.” 

Dr. Revelette points out that The Royal College of Pediatrics and Child Health and the British Journal of Pediatrics have both cut ties with formula companies. He writes that “The time for the American Academy of Pediatrics to do the same and comply with the Code is long overdue.” 

CMF companies in science 

CMF marketing commonly and effectively uses science to build brand credibility and influence the scientific community as Rollins, et al detail in Marketing of commercial milk formula: a system to capture parents, communities, science, and policy.

‘Landscapes and seaports’ (Paysages et ports de mer, dans des ronds)
Stefano della Bella Italian
1639
https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/412519

The authors detail how they misrepresent research and their sponsorship of journals and conclude “the capture of science as a strategic objective of CMF marketing fundamentally shapes medical practice in addition to boosting CMF sales. Science is used in a pincer movement: parents looking to resolve problems accentuated by marketing, with health professionals offering marketing-constructed solutions.” 

One government employee, a practicing physician, who asked to remain anonymous suggests that “most academicians can’t survive (as academicians) without getting sponsor grants for research”. That’s because public funding has decreased in the last couple of decades.  

Patricia Baird notes in Getting it right: industry sponsorship and medical research “…the pharmaceutical industry has become the single largest direct funder of medical research in Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States.”

The anonymous physician says that the number and type of potential competing interests do not tend to concern him especially when there is supplementary data available for review. 

He shares that “Most multi-center studies are done by funding from sponsors since no one Institution has deep enough pockets to do these critically important studies.  I get red flags going off and my ‘BS detector’ starts sounding when I see a small, short author list with a single sponsor funding the study that lacks supplementary data and is making extraordinary claims.” 

One of the touted benefits of working with industry in research is the development of new therapies for patients, as Baird writes and is also noted in ‘Deal with the Devil’: Harvard Medical School Faculty Grapple with Increased Industry Research Funding

However, Baird shares: “…a lack of balance in research activities, with a focus mainly on potential medications, is likely to divert talented researchers from the pursuit of profound scientific questions, or divert them from the pursuit of questions without market relevance but with an aspect of public good. A company has little incentive to support trials evaluating whether inexpensive, off-patent drugs, or whether nonpharmaceutical interventions, could replace their profitable patented drug.”

Because profits are foremost for industry, Baird continues that “it is unrealistic to expect drug companies to stop making drugs to treat diseases that result from [unhealthy behavior].”

This reality, Baird goes on, “highlights the need for funding of research into new and effective ways to get people to change behaviour, and of research into policies that provide incentives and support for healthier behaviours at a population level.” 

*Ahem… Family-friendly policies that support breastfeeding and adoption and adherence of the Code!*  One has to wonder, would maternal infant health look differently if we put as much effort into breastfeeding and supportive policies as we did responding to the formula crisis

One group, the Access to Nutrition Initiative (ATNI) conducts the BMS and CF Marketing indexes which assess the marketing policies of the 20 largest baby food companies globally. This spring, the organization released the Breast Milk Substitutes and Complementary Foods Marketing in the United States: Launch of the 2024 Country Report as a complement to the indexes. The recording of this event can be accessed here

ATNI has created a model policy for companies’ full compliance with the Code. 

Interestingly, ATNI itself has been criticized for its interactions with CMF companies. 

During the release event, ATNI presenters addressed their involvement with CMF companies. It was reported that ATNI consults independent expert groups and releases their methodology on their website. It was also stated that ATNI engages companies at certain points in their process, but that companies cannot decide whether or not they will be evaluated and do not have influence over the research results.

CMF business affairs within nations 

The United States has an enmeshed relationship with formula companies.

L’Avarice (Greed), from “Les Péchées Capitaux” (The Deadly Sins)
Jacques Callot French
ca. 1620
https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/417673

For instance, in Scorched Earth Legal Tactics author Valerie McClain illuminates that “Both the CDC and the FDA have foundations that partner with corporations that donate to their organizations. While these US governmental bodies are not allowed to take money directly from corporations, their foundations through partnerships donate for programs run by the CDC or FDA. The CDC Foundation has a long list of partners who donate various amounts.” 

McClain goes on: “From a political science perspective, corporations entangled with governmental agencies is part of the definition of fascism-a merger of state and corporate power. Every US governmental agency that I have seen has a foundation. So one gets the impression that is one way to pretend that corporations have no influence on governmental policy.” 

She details some of these relationships with specific dollar amounts in the remainder of her piece. 

In another revealing article– The U.S. Government Defended the Overseas Business Interests of Baby Formula Makers. Kids Paid the Price.— author Heather Vogell demonstrates how “the U.S. government repeatedly used its muscle to advance the interests of large baby formula companies while thwarting the efforts of Thailand and other developing countries to safeguard children’s health.” 

And there was the disgraceful act when the U.S. opposed a WHA resolution in 2018 and “blackmailed” Ecuador. 

An administrator from Breastfeeding Advocacy Australia (BAA) explains their country’s involvement with industry: “…Our Government gave the Formula Industry co-operative body, the Infant Nutrition Council (INC) a government grant to expand their international markets. This government one was for India, a country working hard to improve breastfeeding. Last government gave a grant for expansion in Cambodia, a country with historically high breastfeeding now rapidly plummeting. It is immoral and unjust. We must fight for women and babies. It gets worse here in Australia as a developed nation who is enabling this industry. One of our main research organisations SAHMRI has joint trials with Nestle and validates their participation. Unsurprisingly, the result of one trial we’ve seen requires the administration of a Nestle product as an outcome. Then our Doctor group the RACGP, the doctors that virtually all Mums and Bubs see, has their annual conference sponsored by Nestle and that’s just what we’ve seen publicly stated. There is probably much more. We have much work to do.” 

Until our governments do a better job of protecting health over profits and untangle their industry ties, how can we, as maternal child health advocates,  turn down the commercial noise when its notes seem to play everywhere? 

Steven R. Brown’s, MD, FAAFP American Family Physician editorial Physicians Should Refuse Pharmaceutical Industry Gifts offers guidance that is easily adopted for those working as lactation professionals. 

Certified Lactation Counselors should remember the specific line in the Academy of Lactation Policy and Practice (ALPP) Code of Ethics for Certified Lactation Counselors (CLC) which reads that we must “Abide by the International Code of Marketing of Breast-Milk Substitutes and subsequent resolutions which pertain to health workers.”  

The aforementioned Call to end sponsorship from commercial milk formula companies is a promising launching pad in the dismantling of inappropriate care provider- industry relationships. It signifies progress and as BAA offered, we have so much more work to do.  

 

Further reading/ related resources 

 

Glints of hope and control in a burning world

As I gathered my thoughts for an Earth Month and infant feeding installment, I got an email notification that Valerie McClain had published something new on her Substack. Of course I hurried over, because her pieces are always illuminating. She writes in Standing on the Precipice:  “We are self-destructing on our Mother Earth, and she may be the last woman standing amidst the rubble and miles of corpses.”

Photo by Tatiana Syrikova: https://www.pexels.com/photo/anonymous-little-kid-touching-tree-with-hand-3932861/

In all of the pieces and years past that we have covered the connections between infant feeding and planetary health, it never actually occurred to me that there might be a scenario where Mother Earth outlives us. This will surely strike some of you as naive, absurd, delusional, or something else considering what has happened and continues to happen on our planet. Even so, I envisioned humans dying alongside our planet, our self-destruction agonizing and inevitable, as we claw, infect, and deplete Mother Earth with our beastly antics, taking down the innocent in our path to complete decimation. 

On a recent trip to The Museum of Modern Art, I was shaken out of this sense of Doom and flurry of eco-emotions. Victor Grippo’s lead containers with beans first spoke to me, metaphors “for the force and persistence of life”. This display coupled with Niki de Saint Phalle’s phrase “What is now known was once only imagined” infused me with a little glint of hope that I’ve been craving. 

Then on a Throughline episode about consumer protections and trust in and accountability from companies and elected leaders, I heard the voice of Ralph Nader. He offered: Cynicism is “a cop-out. That’s an indulgence. That’s an indulgence of quitters that makes them feel good. Because when you’re cynical, you’re obviously smart, aren’t you? You think you’re smart. No, you’re not smart. You’re playing into the hands of the corporate supremacists. You’re playing into the hands of the few who want to control the many who could easily outvote the few and make the corporations our servants, not our masters.” This offered me a shift in perspective too.

Source: https://www.gifa.org/en/international-2/green-feeding/

Among the hopeful is coverage of the Green Feeding Tool by Kristi Eaton. Eaton quotes Julie Smith, co-creator of the tool: “…with the Green Feeding Tool—designed to provide policymakers, climate scientists, advocates and others with clear data about how increasing support for breastfeeding can help save the planet—we have the evidence to support action.”

Now, consider this headline: Breast milk can expose babies to toxic ‘forever chemicals’

“For decades, physicians and scientists have touted breast milk as liquid gold for its immunological benefits.

But nursing parents with considerable exposure to cancer-linked ‘forever chemicals,’ or PFAS, may unwittingly be exposing their babies to these compounds as well…” the author begins. 

The article acknowledges contaminated water could be a potential source of PFAS which infant formula is often mixed with. The author also includes that “the benefits of nursing likely outweigh the potential risk of PFAS exposure through breast milk.” [Note the language used here. There are generally no benefits to breastfeeding. Instead, there are risks associated with not breastfeeding.] 

Nikki Lee asks some important questions: “Why doesn’t formula get tested for these chemicals?  Do folks believe that somehow cows are protected against pollution?”

As with anything, there will be risks associated with any variation of infant feeding. 

Healthy Children Project’s Karin Cadwell points out that if toxins are being detected in human milk, it means we need to reconsider the products being used in industry.

Photo by willsantt: https://www.pexels.com/photo/woman-breastfeeding-her-toddler-under-the-tree-2714618/

The author of Study Finds High Levels of Toxic Chemicals in Mothers’ Breast Milk quotes Erika Schreder, science director at Toxic-Free Future who shares a similar sentiment: “’If we want to make pregnancy and breastfeeding safe and free from PFAS, we really need to eliminate the use of these chemicals and products, so that we can have clean food, clean air, and clean water… We really don’t believe that responsibility should be placed on individuals when we need regulations to end the use of these chemicals.’”

In the predicament(s) we find ourselves in, I’d like to leave you with a few more of McClain’s words: “A mother cannot control events such as: wars, sieges, shortages of infant formula and pitocin, fires, floods, hurricanes, tornadoes; but she has a semblance of control in her and her baby’s world through breastfeeding. Dependency on always having access to infant formula, health care, freedom from human or environmental violence, should be tempered with the reality that there may be times, when all the civility of life vanishes.” 

More for Earth Month 

Industry lies and the Code

Infant feeding and planetary health go hand in hand 

Breastfeeding is eco-friendly 

Goats and Soda’s How do you keep calm and carry on in a world full of crises?



Rambling about breasts

This week, I’m coming to you with some sort of ramble, an entry of things that have brought me joy over the last few weeks, all breast-related of course.

Wrought iron (assumed unintentional) breasts on Milwaukee building

To begin, a dear friend recently messaged me to share about a date she’d been on. She and the guy got on the topic of breastfeeding; she told him about how a mom’s body and baby’s saliva communicate to influence antibodies. 

“He shared [the info] with a friend who said she was going to switch to pumping her six month old because he got teeth,” she told me. “I was like wow, seriously, that is awesome. But then I also told him not to pump-shame!” 

Art positioned at the Henry Miller Memorial Library in Big Sur, Calif.

On another evening, I was at my kids’ grade school function in a circle with four other parents discussing Doomsday. What might it look like? we wondered. What’s the best approach to survival? What kind of supplies might we need? What will happen to currency? Isn’t it true that Hell is already here on Earth for so many? Breastfeeding and my milk were my answer to any distressing moment when I was lactating. Pink eye? Squirt some breastmilk on it. Kid scraped a knee? Breastfeed. Tumultuous bedtime? Breastfeed. And we know that breastfeeding is a lifeline in any true emergency situation. So I added to the Doomsday discussion, suggesting that I might work on relactation, mostly kidding but also reminiscing about how it used to fix all of my problems. One of my peers gasped, “Oh my god! Is that possible?!” I described how relactation could be possible for some. It was decided that this could be our savior in the event of an apocalypse.

El Niño advertisement at the Lincoln Center features breastfeeding Madonna

Then, last weekend, at an extended family gathering, we all oohed and aahed while the darling 10-month old at the table enjoyed his meal. My oldest daughter, 12, asked what her favorite food was when she was around his age. I thought about it, not remembering anything specific except, “The breast!” My kids liked nothing more than nursing. This embarrassed my daughter, but the rest of us had a good chuckle, and it was good to remember a time when my now preteen only wanted to be with me. 

The other sources of joy that I’d like to share with you come from the internet. 

I’ve been moved by and admiring these provoking, stunning pieces of art:

The Lactation Station 

Breastfeeding with Mother 

Workday Madonna with Child 

My Nurse and I 

Milky Way 

The Harvest

The Awakening Series 

Equally entertaining is an Instagram post by Dr. Katrina Mitchell: “​​The world’s most perfect dog toy: a burning bra, ‘Bite the Patriarchy’”.  

Pregnant belly formation at Crystal Caves on Grand Cayman Island

Then there’s Atlas Obscura which I frequent for oddball attractions in my area and across the globe. This week I came across the Mama Kannon Temple, a Buddhist temple in Japan dedicated to breasts. Somehow, this discovery led me to learn about the legend of Difunta Correa in Argentina. I’ve added both to my travel bucket list. 

And finally, I happened upon the Museum of Motherhood in St. Pete, Fla. It has a boob chair. This brings me immense joy, and I hope it’s a bright spot in your life too. 



Trauma-informed care

More awesome graphics at: https://stores.praeclaruspress.com/free-posters-and-graphics/

Johanna Sargeant’s BA, BEd, IBCLC Mastering Lactation Conversations: Creating Successful and Achievable Care Plans is an excellent reminder of compassionate and effective counseling. Early in her presentation, Sargeant unpacks the perception that lactation care providers (LCP) can sometimes desire breastfeeding “success” more than the clients themselves.

As LCPs, it can be easy to get wrapped up in checklists and targets and “perfect” latches, forgetting about the complexity of the human experience and how infant feeding is inextricably influenced by parents’ lived experiences. Parents must be allowed to define their own terms of success, and as LCPs, we must honor the complexity of their lives. 

April is Sexual Assault Awareness Month which is as good a time as any to focus on trauma-informed care, which should be the standard of care for all perinatal services.  

Sexual trauma is common and affects approximately 20 to 25 percent of women, according to  Kathleen Kendall-Tackett, Ph.D., IBCLC. 

Image by Nadezhda Moryak

“Abuse survivors can experience a full range of responses to breastfeeding: from really disliking it to finding it tremendously healing, “ she writes in an Uppity Science Chick publication.

All of those many years ago that I completed the Lactation Counselor Training Course (LCTC), one of the most striking bits I took away was learning about the “hands off” approach. I was perplexed that this even needed to be emphasized( though I had experienced a “handsy” LCP after the birth of my first daughter and have so many friends who share similar experiences.)

These cloth breasts are a solution to demonstration without touching people’s bodies. (It is advised to exercise care when dealing with breast models in childbirth and breastfeeding education as the symbolic dismembering of the female body can carry powerful negative messages.)

Jennie Toland’s BSN, RN, CLC article on trauma-informed care reminds us that acknowledging the existence of trauma and its effects is the first step LCPs can take to providing proper care.

“Recognizing signs such as anxiety or emotional numbing can prompt further discussion that builds trust and fosters collaboration and engagement,” Toland writes. “…It can be as simple as asking if someone would prefer the door shut for privacy, positioning ourselves so we are not standing over another person when performing assessments, or verbalizing next steps and asking for consent to move forward…. It can happen within just a few seconds as we ask, ‘What is your preference?’ to provide someone with control over their care.”

[Here’s an older piece that explains how the simple prompt “May I?…” changed the way I view healthcare.]  

Toland writes that trauma-informed care does not need to be complicated, and the approaches she suggests aren’t specific to any one kind of trauma. 

While birth and breastfeeding can be remedial and healing for trauma survivors, these experiences can also be the source of abuse and trauma. 

Dr. Gill Thomson’s work describes this phenomenon. 

Dr. Karen Scott’s work through Birthing Cultural Rigor challenges the reality of maternity care for Black Indigenous People of Color (BIPOC). Indeed,  “We cannot fix the maternal mortality problem without fixing the human rights problem at its core.

There are so many others acknowledging trauma and incorporating compassionate care. In Milwaukee, BOMB Doulas are providing wrap-around care services, thorough screenings like the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACES) and sensitive, respectful care.

Photo by Mateusz Dach: https://www.pexels.com/photo/photo-of-baby-on-mother-s-arm-4504005/

The White Ribbon Alliance UK offers programming like Safer Beginnings which includes Free From Harm for maternity workers which works to address obstetric violence.  

There are those like Audrey Gentry-Brown, Full Spectrum Birth Sista, Certified Blactation Educator (CBE), Student Midwife, and Medicine Woman in Loudoun County, Va. working to  rewrite cultural norms within her community, introducing “Afrofuturist healing modalities” that reconnect to “ancestral magic.” 

Xavier Dagba’s words embody her work well: “As you focus on clearing your generational trauma, do not forget to claim your generational strengths. Your ancestors gave you more than just wounds.” 

Photo by Serdi Nam: https://www.pexels.com/photo/close-up-of-mother-breastfeeding-baby-19178588/

Shawn Ginwright, a Black clinician, shares a similar ethos in a piece that challenges traditional approaches to trauma-informed care by exploring the distinction between simple ‘treatment’ and true healing.

“A healing centered approach to addressing trauma requires a different question that moves beyond ‘what happened to you’ to ‘what’s right with you’ and views those exposed to trauma as agents in the creation of their own well-being rather than victims of traumatic events,” Ginwright writes. “Healing centered engagement is akin to the South African term ‘Ubuntu’ meaning that humanness is found through our interdependence, collective engagement and service to others. Additionally, healing centered engagement offers an asset driven approach aimed at the holistic restoration of young peoples’ well-being. The healing centered approach comes from the idea that people are not harmed in a vacuum, and well-being comes from participating in transforming the root causes of the harm within institutions.” Essential reading! 

Other relevant resources and articles